Every result, as it lands
The mark, the paper it came from and the date, the same day the teacher releases it. No waiting for a report card that summarises four months into one number.
Parent Dashboard
Stop waiting for the parents' evening.
Attendance, every result, progress across the term and the two chapters costing your child the most marks — on the day the paper is marked, not at the end of it. And a practice set on those chapters, already made.
Attendance
Results
Weak chapters
Term trend
No school required
Same dayAs the paper is marked
ChaptersNot a class rank
No school neededWorks standalone
IncludedFree on every plan
What a parent sees
Six things, and
Six things, and
a rank is not one.
Everything here is about one child and what would help them. Nothing here is about how they compare to the child sitting next to them.
The two chapters that cost most
Named, with the marks each one lost. “Chapter 7, eleven marks” is a thing a parent can act on. “62%” is not.
Progress across the term
Every assessment plotted, so a dip shows up in week six rather than in a final. The line matters more than any single point on it.
Attendance, without asking
Days present, days missed, and which exams were sat. Where the school records it in Intellicamp, it appears here; where they don't, this card is simply absent rather than empty.
Something to actually do
A practice set on those weak chapters, generated and waiting. The dashboard is only finished when it has produced work rather than a diagnosis.
Few alerts, worth reading
A weekly digest and a note when a result is published. Not a push for every question answered — a parent who mutes you learns nothing all term.
The parent's screen
One child, one screen,
One child, one screen,
one thing to do next.
Read standing in a kitchen, not sitting at a desk — so it is a phone, and it is short. Beside it, every alert we send and every one we deliberately don't.
R
Riya SharmaClass IX-A · Ridgeview Public School
Latest result · Science
54of 80Today
Costing the most marks
Chapter 7 · Motion−11
Chapter 6 · Pressure−8
This term · six papers
Practice set ready12 questions on Chapters 6 and 7
Three notifications a week, at most. The restraint is the feature. Anything that would make a parent open the app out of anxiety rather than usefulness is something we have deliberately not built.
Four views, one truth
The same exam,
The same exam,
four different screens.
One paper produces one set of facts. What differs is how much of it each role can see — and the parent column is the one schools ask about first.
What the screen shows
Their own marks
Every question, with the AI's working beside any written answer.
The total and the per-chapter breakdown. Not the working on individual answers.
Everything, including the working and the ability to override any score.
The class average
Shown, for context on where the paper sat.
Shown, for the same reason. It is a yardstick, not a league table.
Shown, plus the full distribution.
A position in the class
Never. We do not compute a rank and there is no setting to turn one on.
Never. This is the single most requested feature we have refused.
Never. A teacher sees the distribution, which is more useful and less corrosive.
Another child's result
Never, under any configuration.
Never. A parent account is scoped to their own children and nothing else.
Yes, for the divisions they teach. That is the job.
Weak chapters
Their own two or three, with a practice set attached.
The same two or three. Parent and child are looking at one list, which is the point.
Per student and across the division, so a class-wide gap shows as a column.
The institute owner sees a fourth view covering every division and teacher, and it is deliberately not shown here — it is the only one a parent has no window into, and pretending otherwise on a marketing page would be dishonest.
A rank tells you who won. A chapter tells you what to do on Sunday.
Both of these describe the same paper and the same child. One of them can be acted on before the next assessment. We only ever show you the second, and this is why.
A rank
versus
- 1Aarav M.71
- 2Diya K.68
- 3Kabir S.66
- 9Riya S.54
Tells a parent nine children scored higher. Suggests nothing to do about it, and gives the eight below her a reason to stop trying.
A chapter
Chapter 7 · Motion−11
Chapter 6 · Pressure−8
Chapter 4 · Matter−5
Practice set ready12 questions on Chapters 6 and 7
Twenty-four of the twenty-six lost marks sit in three chapters. That is a Sunday afternoon, not a verdict.
Where it comes from
Five sources in.
Five sources in.
Three things left out.
A parent's screen is assembled from things the platform already knows. What matters as much is the list of things that exist in the system and deliberately never reach it.
One child per record
A parent account is scoped to the children linked to it. There is no query in the product that returns another family's data to a parent, which is a design decision rather than a permission setting.
Teacher notes stay with the teacher
Free-text comments a teacher writes while reviewing a script are working notes, not a report. They never appear on a parent's screen, because a teacher who knows a parent is reading stops writing honestly.
Behaviour is not our business
Proctoring signals, tab switches and session logs stay between the student and the teacher who marks them. We do not forward conduct data to parents, and we will not add it.
3 of 5 alerts on
Does the school need to be on it?
No. But it is
No. But it is
better if they are.
The most common question, answered as a decision rather than a paragraph. Both routes end somewhere useful; one of them ends somewhere better.
Q1
Does your child's school already run exams on Intellicamp?
Q2
Would the school be willing to try it for one division?
Q3
Do you know your child's board, standard and subjects?
Standalone is genuinely usable, not a lesser tier.
The one thing it cannot give you is the school's own papers and attendance, because those belong to the school. Everything the platform generates — papers, marking, chapters, trend, practice — works identically either way.
The first fortnight
What actually happens
What actually happens
in the first two weeks.
Not a feature list. The order things arrive in, so you know whether it is working before deciding whether to keep paying for it.
Either the school links your account or you pick board, standard and subjects yourself. Nothing else is asked for — no address, no phone number, no photograph of your child.
2 minutesNo cardA mark, the paper it came from, and the chapter breakdown underneath. This is usually the moment a parent realises the number was never the useful part.
Same dayPer chapterGenerated on the two chapters that lost the most marks, sized for a sitting rather than an evening. Your child does it; you see what came back.
12 questionsTargetedOne email. What changed this week, which chapter improved, which one didn't, and the single thing worth doing next week. If it is ever longer than that, we have got it wrong.
WeeklyOne screenThree or four results in, the line starts to mean something. Before this point the dashboard shows you data; from here it starts showing you direction.
3+ papersPer subjectThe actual outcome we are aiming at. “How was school?” produces nothing. “How did Chapter 7 go — it cost you eleven marks last time?” produces a conversation.
The point
Questions
What parents ask
What parents ask
in the first week.
The four that come up almost every time.
You see the class average, so you know whether a paper was hard or your child found it hard. You do not see a rank, a position or another child's marks, and there is no plan or setting that unlocks them — we do not compute a rank at all. This is the single most requested feature we have refused, and we refuse it because a rank tells a parent who won without telling them anything they can help with. The chapter breakdown does the opposite.
Subscribe on your own. You pick the board, standard and subjects, generate practice papers, and your child sits them at home — the marking, the chapter breakdown and the trend all work identically. What standalone cannot give you is the school's own papers and attendance, because that data belongs to the school. If they later adopt it, your existing account links to theirs and the history you have built stays.
Yes, and deliberately. Students can see that a parent account is linked to theirs. We are not building surveillance software for families — you and your child are looking at the same two weak chapters, which only works if it is not a secret. What you cannot see is anything your child writes in an answer beyond the mark it earned, or any teacher's private working notes.
It is used to mark their papers and produce their reports, and nothing else. Answer scripts are never training data, never shared with a third party, and never sold. A parent account only ever returns data for the children linked to it. Retention follows the institute's policy where the school owns the account, or yours where you subscribed directly — and you can export everything or delete the account at any point without contacting anyone.
Ready when you are
Ask their school, or start on your own.
Free to try, no card, and nothing to install. Two minutes to the first practice set.